Weight Watchers Diet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigationJump to search This article is about Weight Watchers diet. For the parent company, see WW International.

Weight Watchers is a comprehensive diet program, including a tailored diet with a point system, counseling and behavioral therapies.

Weight Watchers or WW is a popular[1] commercial diet and comprehensive program for weight loss based on a point system, meals replacement and counseling. It is a leader in the commercial diet industry.[2][3]

This diet produces weight loss comparable to other diets supervised by a nutrition professional.[2][4][5]

In 2018, Weight Watchers was ranked 1st in “Best commercial diet”, “Best Weight-Loss Diets” and “Best Fast Weight-Loss Diets” and 2nd in “Easiest Diets to Follow”.[6]

Contents

Description

Dietary principles

The Weight Watchers diet is aiming to restrict energy to achieve a weight loss of 0.5 to 1.0 kg per week,[2][7] which is the medically accepted standard rate of a viable weight loss strategy.[8]

The dietary composition is akin to low-fat diets[2] or moderate-fat and low-carbohydrate diet[9] depending on the variant used.

Point values system

A Weight Watchers sliding ruler to track food points to ease calories restriction targets.

Contrary to several other diets, Weight Watchers does not focus on the calories but simplify food selection with a points-based system named “SmartPoints”, where each food type is assigned a point value calculated according to their nutrient and energy density. A point equals 50kcal. The point values system define both a quality scale and a quantity limit: a food with low point values, such as high fiber carbohydrates, lean proteins, legumes, can be consumed more freely and in higher quantities, whereas food items with higher point values must be eaten with parsimony or avoided. Most fruits and vegetables are “free”, as they have a zero points value, and thus can be consumed at will.[2][10]

Meal replacement

The parent company also produces meal replacements, which are “plug-in” meals that can be instantly consumed instead of the usual diet. Meal replacements have been shown to outperform calorie-controlled diets as there is less margin for errors and less decision-making and cooking skills are required.[2]

Counselling

In addition to the diet and related consumable products made by the brand, the Weight Watchers is a comprehensive program, including counseling via weekly or monthly meetings, calorie targets and online support.[2][10]

For children, online support, especially via social media, has shown mixed results.[11]

Behavioral therapy

The dieters are also recommended to engage in regular physical activity as part of a broader lifestyle change to complement their dietary changes,[10] which mirrors the US national recommendations since 2013.[4][12]

Efficacy

The scientific soundness of commercial diets by commercial weight management organizations (CWMOs) varies widely, being previously non-evidence-based, so there is only limited evidence supporting their use, including Weight Watchers, due notably to high attrition rates.[2][3][5][7][13][14]

Weight Watchers results in modest weight loss in the long-term, similarly to other commercial diets,[5][13][15][16] non-commercial diets and standard care,[2][4] although Weight Watchers may have less cardiovascular[17] and glucose-lowering benefits than other diets such as low-carbohydrates.[18]

Comprehensive diet programs such as Weight Watchers, providing counseling and targets for calorie intake, are more efficient than dieting without guidance (“self-help”),[2][19][20] although the evidence is very limited.[14] The NICE devised a set of essential criteria to be met by commercial weight management organizations to be approved.[7]

Adherence to a diet is the best predictor of a diet’s success in weight loss and health benefits. As such, Weight Watchers, being a comprehensive dietary program, has shown good adherence comparable or lower than standard care, and with slightly more consistent long-term results.[2][3][5][21]

Comprehensive diet programs, combining dietary changes with exercise, behavioral therapy, meals replacement and/or calorie restriction, were shown to be more effective than any single change for long-term prevention of weight gain and risks of metabolic syndromes in lean individuals,[22] mirroring similar results for obese individuals.[2][4][23]

Up to 90% of consumers partaking in CWMOs programs are women, despite obesity being more prevalent in men.[7][14]

In a trial comparing 4 weight loss diets, the drop-out rate for the Weight Watchers diet was 35% (compared to others which had up to 50% drop-outs).[24]

History

Main article: WW International § Inception

Jean Nidetch, a housewife and mother living in Queens, New York City, conceived the original Weight Watchers diet and program in the 1960s, after her dissatisfaction in following the “Prudent Diet”, a diet developed in the 1950s by Dr. Norman Jolliffe, head of the board’s Bureau of Nutrition. Bringing inspiration from this successful but difficult to sustain diet, the original Weight Watchers was based around lean meat, fish, skim milk, and fruits and vegetables, and it banned alcohol, sweets, and fatty foods. It thus had lists of allowed and prohibited foods, and was more structured than subsequent versions of the Weight Watchers program, such as recommended weighing food portions, prohibited skipping meals or counting calories, before later adopting a more flexible point based system.

In the past, CMWOs were inappropriately associated with fad diets, giving them an unfounded poor reputation,[7] although some authors still do.[1][9][10][21]

Economy

As of 2013, over a million members attend its weekly group meetings over the world. As of 2017, Weight Watchers is the leader in the diet industry.[2][3] The diet industry represents sixty billion dollars in 2018, of which 3 billion dollars is spent on weight loss chains such as Weight Watchers, with meal replacements, including Weight Watchers meals, being another 3 billion dollars.[25]

Two systematic reviews found that Weight Watchers was the most cost-effective commercial diet as of 2019.[26][27]

See also

References

Zoumbaris, Sharon K.; Bijlefeld, Marjolijn (25 November 2014). Encyclopedia of diet fads : understanding science and society (2nd ed.). Greenwood. ISBN9781610697606. Thom, G; Lean, M (May 2017). “Is There an Optimal Diet for Weight Management and Metabolic Health?” (PDF). Gastroenterology (Review). 152 (7): 1739–1751. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.056. PMID28214525. Wadden, Thomas A.; Webb, Victoria L.; Moran, Caroline H.; Bailer, Brooke A. (6 March 2012). “Lifestyle Modification for Obesity”. Circulation (Narrative review). 125 (9): 1157–1170. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.039453. PMC3313649. PMID22392863. Jensen, MD; Ryan, DH; Apovian, CM; Ard, JD; Comuzzie, AG; Donato, KA; Hu, FB; Hubbard, VS; Jakicic, JM; Kushner, RF; Loria, CM; Millen, BE; Nonas, CA; Pi-Sunyer, FX; Stevens, J; Stevens, VJ; Wadden, TA; Wolfe, BM; Yanovski, SZ; Jordan, HS; Kendall, KA; Lux, LJ; Mentor-Marcel, R; Morgan, LC; Trisolini, MG; Wnek, J; Anderson, JL; Halperin, JL; Albert, NM; Bozkurt, B; Brindis, RG; Curtis, LH; DeMets, D; Hochman, JS; Kovacs, RJ; Ohman, EM; Pressler, SJ; Sellke, FW; Shen, WK; Smith SC, Jr; Tomaselli, GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice, Guidelines.; Obesity, Society. (24 June 2014). “2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society”. Circulation (Professional society guideline). 129 (25 Suppl 2): S102-38. doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee. PMC5819889. PMID24222017. Atallah, R.; Filion, K. B.; Wakil, S. M.; Genest, J.; Joseph, L.; Poirier, P.; Rinfret, S.; Schiffrin, E. L.; Eisenberg, M. J. (11 November 2014). “Long-Term Effects of 4 Popular Diets on Weight Loss and Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials”. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (Systematic review of RCTs). 7 (6): 815–827. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000723. PMID25387778. “U.S. News Reveals Best Diets Rankings for 2018”. U.S. News & World Report. Avery, Amanda (2018). “4.7 Commercial weight management organisations for weight loss in obesity.”. In Hankey, Catherine (ed.). Advanced nutrition and dietetics in obesity. Wiley. pp. 177–182. ISBN9780470670767. “Fact Sheet—Fad diets” (PDF). British Dietetic Association. 2014. Retrieved 12 December 2015. Fad-diets can be tempting as they offer a quick-fix to a long-term problem. Khawandanah, Jomana; Tewfik, Ihab (15 November 2016). “Fad Diets: Lifestyle Promises and Health Challenges”. Journal of Food Research (Review). 5 (6): 80. doi:10.5539/jfr.v5n6p80. Kuchkuntla, AR; Limketkai, B; Nanda, S; Hurt, RT; Mundi, MS (December 2018). “Fad Diets: Hype or Hope?”. Current Nutrition Reports (Review). 7 (4): 310–323. doi:10.1007/s13668-018-0242-1. PMID30168044. Li, Jennifer S.; Barnett, Tracie A.; Goodman, Elizabeth; Wasserman, Richard C.; Kemper, Alex R. (15 January 2013). “Approaches to the Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity: The Role of Social Networks and the Use of Social Media and Related Electronic Technologies”. Circulation. 127 (2): 260–267. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182756d8e. PMID23212719. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). “2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans – health.gov”. health.gov (National guideline). Skyhorse Publishing Inc. Retrieved 30 September 2019. Tsai, AG; Wadden, TA (4 January 2005). “Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States”. Annals of Internal Medicine (Systematic review). 142 (1): 56–66. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00012. PMID15630109. Allan, Karen (2018). “4.4 Group‐based interventions for weight loss in obesity.”. In Hankey, Catherine (ed.). Advanced nutrition and dietetics in obesity. Wiley. pp. 164–168. ISBN9780470670767. Vakil, RM; Doshi, RS; Mehta, AK; Chaudhry, ZW; Jacobs, DK; Lee, CJ; Bleich, SN; Clark, JM; Gudzune, KA (1 June 2016). “Direct comparisons of commercial weight-loss programs on weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure: a systematic review”. BMC Public Health (Systematic review). 16: 460. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3112-z. PMC4888663. PMID27246464. Gudzune, KA; Doshi, RS; Mehta, AK; Chaudhry, ZW; Jacobs, DK; Vakil, RM; Lee, CJ; Bleich, SN; Clark, JM (7 April 2015). “Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review”. Annals of Internal Medicine (Systematic review). 162 (7): 501–12. doi:10.7326/M14-2238. PMC4446719. PMID25844997. Mehta, AK; Doshi, RS; Chaudhry, ZW; Jacobs, DK; Vakil, RM; Lee, CJ; Bleich, SN; Clark, JM; Gudzune, KA (September 2016). “Benefits of commercial weight-loss programs on blood pressure and lipids: a systematic review”. Preventive Medicine. 90: 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.028. PMC5300307. PMID27373206. Snorgaard, O; Poulsen, GM; Andersen, HK; Astrup, A (2017). “Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes”. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 5 (1): e000354. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000354. PMC5337734. PMID28316796. Kernan, Walter N.; Inzucchi, Silvio E.; Sawan, Carla; Macko, Richard F.; Furie, Karen L. (January 2013). “Obesity – A Stubbornly Obvious Target for Stroke Prevention”. Stroke (Review). 44 (1): 278–286. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.639922. PMID23111440. Gudzune, KA; Doshi, RS; Mehta, AK; Chaudhry, ZW; Jacobs, DK; Vakil, RM; Lee, CJ; Bleich, SN; Clark, JM (April 7, 2015). “Efficacy of commercial weight-loss programs: an updated systematic review”. Annals of Internal Medicine. 162 (7): 501–512. doi:10.7326/M14-2238. PMC4446719. PMID25844997. Zarraga, Ignatius G.E.; Schwarz, Ernst R. (29 August 2006). “Impact of Dietary Patterns and Interventions on Cardiovascular Health”. Circulation (Review). 114 (9): 961–973. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.603910. PMID16940205. Brown, T; Avenell, A; Edmunds, LD; Moore, H; Whittaker, V; Avery, L; Summerbell, C (November 2009). “Systematic review of long-term lifestyle interventions to prevent weight gain and morbidity in adults”. Obesity Reviews. 10 (6): 627–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00641.x. hdl:2164/781. PMID19754634. Arnett, Donna K.; Blumenthal, Roger S.; Albert, Michelle A.; Buroker, Andrew B.; Goldberger, Zachary D.; Hahn, Ellen J.; Himmelfarb, Cheryl D.; Khera, Amit; Lloyd-Jones, Donald; McEvoy, J. William; Michos, Erin D.; Miedema, Michael D.; Muñoz, Daniel; Smith, Sidney C.; Virani, Salim S.; Williams, Kim A.; Yeboah, Joseph; Ziaeian, Boback (17 March 2019). “2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease”. Circulation. 140 (11): e596–e646. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. PMID30879355. Matarese, LE; Pories, WJ (December 2014). “Adult weight loss diets: metabolic effects and outcomes”. Nutrition in Clinical Practice (Review). 29 (6): 759–67. doi:10.1177/0884533614550251. PMID25293593. Berger, A.A. (2018). Perspectives on everyday life : a cross disciplinary cultural analysis. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99795-7_2. ISBN978-3-319-99794-0. Finkelstein, EA; Verghese, NR (April 2019). “Incremental cost-effectiveness of evidence-based non-surgical weight loss strategies”. Clinical Obesity. 9 (2): e12294. doi:10.1111/cob.12294. PMID30677252. Finkelstein, EA; Kruger, E (September 2014). “Meta- and cost-effectiveness analysis of commercial weight loss strategies”. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 22 (9): 1942–51. doi:10.1002/oby.20824. PMID24962106.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *